Tables
Up one level
-
Individual (main effects) model variables and their types
—
by
matthew
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:13 AM
-
A listing of all 37 single variable or main effects used in the study’s modeling exercise along with pertinent variable type classifications used in model comparisons.
-
Testing Table
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Frequently reported invasive plant species on public lands in the southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Results of survey of 41 state, Federal, and non-governmental agencies about the most problematic invasive plants on public lands in the southern Appalachians. Species are separated into three categories based upon the frequency with which they were report
-
Relationships of Amphibians and Reptiles to Vegetative Cover Types
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 14.6--Summary of financial analysis of loblolly pine by MIC for medium sites (pulpwood $25 per cord, sawtimber $350 per thousand board feet) at 6 percent real discount rate
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 14.7--Summary results of forest management surveys by ownership group and year
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.1--Area of forest land by State and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.2--Area of timberland by State, year, and ownership class, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.3--National forests by State, date established, original NFS acreage, and current NFS acreage, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.4--Area of nonindustrial private timberland by State, survey date, forested tract-size class, and forest management type
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.5--Area of timberland by year and forest-type group, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.6--Area of timberland by State, year, and forest-type group, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.7--Area of timberland by State, year, and stand-size class for softwood and hardwood, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.8--Area of timberland by State, forest management type, and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Physical Responses to Altered Flow Regimes
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.9--Change in area of timberland between 1989 and 1999 by State, previous and current forest management type, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.10--Area of timberland by stand-age class and forest management type, Southern United States, 1999
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.11--Volume of growing stock on timberland by State and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.12--Volume of softwood growing stock on timberland by State and year, Southern Unites States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.13--Volume of hardwood growing stock on timberland by state and year, Southern Unites States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.14--Volume of growing stock on timberland by year and diameter class, Southern Unites States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.15--Volume of softwood growing stock on timberland by year and diameter class, Southern Unites States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.16--Volume of hardwood growing stock on timberland by year and diameter class, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.17--Volume of growing stock on timberland by year and ownership class, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.18--Volume of growing stock on timberland by forest-type group and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Threatened, Endangered, and Special Concern Mollusc Species in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
As of 1995, these species were either federally listed as endangered (E), threatened (T), proposed endangered (PE), category 1 (1) candidate, or former category 2 (2) candidate or globally ranked as G1, G2, G3, or a variant by The Nature Conservancy (exce
-
Table 16.19--Average net annual growth of growing stock on timberland by species group and year, Southern Unites States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.20--Average net annual growth of growing stock on timberland by year and ownership class, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.21--Average annual growth of growing stock on timberland by forest-type group and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.22--Average annual removals of growing stock on timberland by species group and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.23--Average annual removals of growing stock on timberland by year and ownership class, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.24--Average annual removals of growing stock on timberland by forest-type group and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.25--Average annual mortality of growing stock on timberland by species group and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.26--Average annual mortality of growing stock on timberland by year and ownership class, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.27--Average annual mortality of growing stock on timberland by forest-type group and year, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.28--Volume, average net annual growth, average annual removals, and mortality of growing stock on timberland by species and stand origin, Southern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Test Table 1
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.29--Area of timberland by Province and forest-type group, Southern United States, 1999
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.30--Area of timberland by Province for planted pine/oak-pine, natural pine/oak-pine, and hardwoods, Southern United States, 1999
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.31--Area of timberland by Province and ownership class, Southern United States, 1999
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.32--Volume of live timber on timberland by Province, softwood and hardwood, Southern United States, 1999
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 16.33--Average net annual growth and removals of growing stock on timberland by Province, softwood and hardwood, Southern United States, 1999
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 17.1--Forest type listing with associated pest species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 17.2--Summary of results of the individual forest pest analyses
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 18.1--Acid Neutralizing Capacity (ANC) categories for brook trout response
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 18.2--Estimates of ambient O3 effects on growth of forest tree species occurring in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 18.3--Aboveground tree carbon in southern forests by owner group
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 18.4--Aboveground tree carbon in southern forests by forest type group
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.1--Common causes of pollution summarized from National Water Quality Inventory Reports
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.2--Common sources of pollution summarized from National Water Quality Inventory Reports
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.3--Interrelationship between common sources and causes of pollution
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.4--Leading sources of impairment of rivers and streams in Southern States from 1988 to 1998
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.5--Overall watershed characterization in Southern States using Index of Watershed Indicators data
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.6--Watershed characterization of ecological provinces in the South using Index of Watershed Indicators data
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.7--National Water Quality Assessment Program study units in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.8--Agricultural land-use practices and associated pollutants
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 19.9--Overall watershed characterization in Southern States using Unified Watershed Assessment criteria
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Species List
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
List of Oak Species
-
Table 19.10--Watershed characterization of ecological provinces in the South using Unified Watershed Assessment criteria
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 20.1--Composite of National Wetland Inventory (NW) wetland status and trend information for the Conterminous and Southeastern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 20.2--Comparison of total wetland and forested wetland acres and the predominant cause of change
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 20.3--Estimated acres of palustrine forested wetland conversion and loss by state and by activity in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 20.4--Comparison of forested wetland community types and extents with hydrogeomorphic class
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 20.5--Wetland Reserve Program acres by State in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 21.1--Total river miles impaired by silviculture in the South (1988-1998)
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 22.1—Best management practice implementation monitoring program characteristics of 13 Southern States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.1--The Association for Biodiversity Information (ABI) maintains an electronic database (NatureServe 2000). The definitions for various levels of imperilment given for individual species by ABI are used in this Assessment
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.2--Aquatic species in seven taxonomic groups of were selected for evaluation of their vulnerability to extinction based on the Global Ranking they received from ABI. Global Rankings are based on queries of the database (NatureServe 2000) on the d
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 20.2--Comparison of total wetland and forested wetland acres and the predominant cause of change
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.3--Habitat preferences for the rare aquatic species are displayed. Five general habitat categories are evaluated in the Assessment; only habitats that are significantly used are considered
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.4--The rare aquatic crustaceans evaluated included 159, species of which 9 are Federally listed as threatened or endangered
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.5--The rare aquatic insects evaluated included 176 species, of which 2 are Federally listed as threatened or endangered
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.6--The rare aquatic snails evaluated included 123 species, of which 11 are Federally listed as threatened or endangered
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.7--The rare mussels evaluated included 191 species, of which 71 are Federally listed as threatened or endangered
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.8--The rare fish evaluated included 165 species, of which 45 are Federally listed as threatened or endangered
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.9--The rare aquatic amphibians evaluated included 31 species, of which 5 are Federally listed as threatened or endangered
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 23.10--The rare aquatic reptiles evaluated included 19 species, of which 8 are Federally listed as threatened or endangered
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 25.1--Occurrence and frequency of presettlement fire regime types by SAF cover types
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 25.2--Prescribed burning regimes to improve wildlife habitat
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 20.1--Composite of National Wetland Inventory (NW) wetland status and trend information for the Conterminous and Southeastern United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
t170
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Growing Stock Inventory
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Growing stock inventory (million cubic feet) and sawtimber share of growing stock for the Southern Appalachian Assessment area and subregions.
-
U.S. Hardwood Lumber Consumption
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Figure showing US hardwood lumber consumption by major use, in the years 1977, 1982
-
Acreage and percentage of nonfederal rural land
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Acreage and percentage of nonfederal rural land by type of use and primary and secondary designation, 1992
-
Area of Commercial Forest
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Area of commercial forest, volume of all hardwood and yellow-poplar growing stick, and the proportion of hardwoods in yellow-poplar by four Timber Production Provinces, 1974.
-
Volume and Proportion of the Growing Stock Volume
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Volume and proportion of the growing stock volume in periodic annual growth, removals, and mortality for yellow-poplar in four Timber Production Provinces.
-
Stocking of Yellow-Poplar on Commercial Timberland
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Stocking of yellow-poplar on commercial timberland in the East by diameter class; data is for 1970.
-
Insects That Affect Yellow-Poplar
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Yellow-poplar is attacked by a variety of insects. However, only four species are considered to have significant economic impact. Dashes under the common name means that no common name is known for that species.
-
Diseases That Affect Yellow-Poplar
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Fire scars, logging damage, animal and bird damage, top breakage, dying limbs, and decaying parent stumps of sprout origin stems all provide entry for decay-causing fungi. Note that some species have no known common names.
-
Significant Factors for Yellow-Poplar Soil-Site Estimations
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The major soil and topographic features found useful in estimating site index with soil-site equations is summarized by region.
-
Table 20.3--Estimated acres of palustrine forested wetland conversion and loss by state and by activity in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Recommended Residual Basal Areas to Maximize Board-Foot Growth and Accelerate Diameter Growth of Yellow-Poplar
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Residual basal area at upper end of range will maximize board-foot growth after thinning. Basal area at the lower end of range will produce approximately 95% or more of potential board-foot growth while concurrently accelerating rate of diameter growth.
-
Regeneration at 18 years
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of regeneration at 18 years following Clean Cut of a Mature Stand.
-
Influence of Shade on Growth and Biomass Petitioning in Seedlings of Cherrybark Oak
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Upland White Oak
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Evaluation of regeneration for Eastern United States upland white oak species/species groups as a function of site quality and regeneration origin.
-
Bottomland White Oak
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Evaluation of regeneration for Estern United States bottomland white oak species/species groups as a function of site quality and regeneration origin.
-
Upland Red Oak
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Evaluation of regeneration for Eastern United States upland red oak species/species groups as a function of site quality and regeneration origin.
-
Bottomland Red Oak
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Evaluation of regeneration for Eastern United States bottomland red oak species/species groups as a function of site quality and regeneration origin.
-
Western Oak Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Evaluation for regeneneration of Western United States oak species/species groups (subgenuses combined) as a function of site quality and regeneration origin.
-
Regeneration-related silvical characteristics
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Summary of regeneration related silvical characteristics of 31 oak species native to the United States, noting important issues, values, and relative assessment of the available reasearch knowledge.
-
Occurance, Shade, Flood Tolerance, and Reproductive traits of Bottomland Oak Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Occurrence, shade and flood tolerance, and reproductive characteristics of the bottomland oak species.
-
Table 20.4--Comparison of forested wetland community types and extents with hydrogeomorphic class
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Influence of Shade
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Influence of Shade on Growth and Biomass Petitioning in Seedlings of Cherrybark Oak
-
Summary of Regenration-Related Silvical Characteristics
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Summary of regeration-related silvical characteristics of 31 oak species native to the U.S., noting important uses, values, and relative assessment of the available rasearach knowledge.
-
Advance Production in Central States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Advance reproduction per acre on good and average sites in some central states.
-
Germination and Moisture Contents of Cherrybark Oak Acorns
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Germination and moisture contents of cherrybark oak acorns stored in polyethylene bags at 3 degrees C and 8 degrees C.
-
Viability and Retention of Various Southern White Oak Acorns
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Viability retension of various southern white oak acorns stored at 2 degrees C, high moisture content, and in polyethylene bags.
-
Equliibrium Moisture Contents of Acorn for Three Southern Oaks
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Equlibrium moisture contents of acorns for 3 southern oaks stored under two condidtions of tempoerature and humidity.
-
Germination and Moisture Contents of Cherrybark Oak Acorns
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Germination and moisture contents of cherrybark oak acorns stored in polyethylene bags at 3 degrees C and 8 degrees C.
-
Water Use in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of total water use in the southern Appalachian Assessment area in million gallons per day (mgd) from 1985-90. From county water use data.
-
Total Water Use in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of total water use in million gallons per day (mgd) in the SAA area for thermoelectric cooling during 1985 and 1990.
-
Water Surface Area of Flooded Rivers and Lakes
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Water surface area of flooded rivers and lakes in the Southern Appalachian Assessment region. The large area in Tennessee reflects the extent of Tennessee Valley Authority facilities.
-
Major Purposes of Fire Use by Cultural Period
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 20.5--Wetland Reserve Program acres by State in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Chemical Survey of Streams
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Modified Wentworth Sediment Classification
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Based on Cummins (1962).
-
Threatened, Endangered, and Special Concern Fish Species in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
As of 1995, these species were either federally listed as endangered (E), threatened (T), proposed endangered (PE), category 1 (1) candidate, or former category 2 (2) candidate or globally ranked as G1, G2, G3, or a variant by The Nature Conservancy (exce
-
Threatened, endangered, and special concern mollusc species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Imperiled species are either federally listed as endangered (E), threatened (T), proposed endangered (PE), category 1 candidate for listing, or category 2 candidate (designation now discontinued).
-
Threatened, Endangered, and Special Concern Reptile and Amphibian Species in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
As of 1995, these species were either federally listed as endangered (E), threatened (T), proposed endangered (PE), category 1 (1) candidate, or former category 2 (2) candidate or globally ranked as G1, G2, G3, or a variant by The Nature Conservancy (exce
-
Threatened, Endangered, and Special Concern Aquatic Insect and Other Invertebrate Species in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
As of 1995, these species were either federally listed as endangered (E), threatened (T), proposed endangered (PE), category 1 (1) candidate, or former category 2 (2) candidate or globally ranked as G1, G2, G3, or a variant by The Nature Conservancy (exce
-
Reservoirs in the Southern Appalachian Region Greater Than About 500 Acres (About 1 Square Mile) That Have Trout Populations.
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Reservoirs in the southern Appalachian region greater than about 500 acres (about 1 square mile) that have trout populations.
-
Species Collected From Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Species collected from southern Appalachian hardwood forests for floral decorative products.
-
National Level Direction from the Forest Service Manual (FSM) and Handbook (FSH) concerning NTFPs.
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
In general, national level administrators have authority to issue most service-wide directives for programs within their jurisdiction. This summarizes these service-wide issuances concerning NTFPs in both the FSM and the FSH.
-
Saleable products identified in the Forest Service Handbook
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Saleable products identified in the Forest Service Handbook (Amendment 2409.18-91-3) at the national level.
-
Table 1--Major questions addressed during the Southern Forest Resource Assessment. Each question is addressed in a chapter of the technical report.
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Regional Direction
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table summarizing the four Field Issuances from the Southern Region (Region 8) that have been entered into the FSDS concerning NTFPs since 1994.
-
National Level Direction from the Forest Service Manual (FSM) and Handbook (FSH) concerning NTFPs.
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Regional Direction from the Forest Service Manual (FSM) and Handbook (FSH) concerning NTFPs.
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
National Level Direction
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of National Level Direction from the Forest Service Manual (FSM) and Handbook (FSH) concerning NTFPs
-
Saleable Products
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of saleable products identified in the Forest Service Handbook (Amendment 2409.18-91-3) at the national level
-
Regional Direction
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of regional direction from the Forest Service Manual (FSM) and Handbook (FSH) concerning NTFPs
-
Ecosystem Section Occurrence in Wilderness and Roadless Areas in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
In the southern Appalachians specifically, 7 of a total of 10 ecosystem sections are represented in either wilderness or roadless areas.
-
Ecosystem section occurance in wilderness and roadless areas in the southern appalachians.
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Ecosystem section occurance in wilderness and roadless areas in the southern appalachians.
-
Acres of officially designated wilderness in the Southern Appalachian mountains
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Acres of officially designated wilderness in the Southern Appalachian mountains.
-
Roadless areas on national forests, national parks, and state parks in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of roadless areas on national forests, national parks, and state parks in the southern appalachians.
-
Table 1.1--Terrestrial vertebrate species classified as presumed (GX) or possibly (GH) extinct in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Ecosystem Section Occurrence in Wilderness and Roadless Areas in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of ecosystem section occurrence in wilderness and roadless areas in the southern Appalachians.
-
Annual Recreation Use of National Forest Wilderness in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Annual recreation use of national forest wilderness in the southern Appalachians.
-
Biological Diversity Table
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Biological diversity can be expressed at different scales (e.g., landscapes, ecosystems, communities, species, genes) and within different parameters (structural, compositional, and functional attributes). The following table, adopted from Putz et al. 200
-
Marking Guide
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Number of Trees to be Cut by Individual-Tree Selection Cutting for a 50-acre Stand (for q ratio of 1.3, residual basal area of 80 sq. ft., and largest tree-to-grow of 32 in.)
-
Functional Role of Fire in the Ecology of Oak Regeneration
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Functional Role of Fire in the Ecology of Oak Regeneration
-
Effect of Fire on Insects
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Direct and indirect effects of fire on insects.
-
Uses of Mechanical, Chemical, Fire and Biological Methods
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Uses of Mechanical, Chemical, Fire and Biological Methods for site preparation.
-
Silvicultural Modifications for Structural Restoration
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Tappeiner and others have summarized the various silvicultural activities appropriate for each of these stages.
-
Contrasts between dispersed and aggregated structural retention
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Dispersed and aggregated retention are two contrasting spatial models of structural retention. Each has its own set of ecological advantages and disadvantages and therefore specific applications in retention harvesting. Combinations of the two can be desi
-
Relative site quality terms in relation to species and site index
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Doolittle (1958) compared site indices for 10 species in the Southern Appalachians and found consistent differences between upland oak species and yellow-poplar. The index for yellow poplar exceeded that of oaks on very good sites but fell short of the o
-
Table 1.2--Vertebrate species extirpated from selected States within the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Comparison of site indices
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of comparison of site indices, Basal Area, and Volume at 50 yrs. for 10 southern Appalachian species on 3 sites.
-
Sample Landtype Description
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Sample of Forest Management Interpretations for Landtype 24
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table of sample of forest management interpretations for landtype 24
-
Management Potential of Ecological Units
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
By delineating ecological units, this system can be used as a tool to identify land or water areas that have similar potential for management, and therefore can facilitate a more ecological approach to resource planning, management, and reasearch.
-
Map Unit Design Criteria of Ecological Units
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Ecological units, which delimit areas of different biological potential, are mapped based on (1) potential natural communities, (2) soils, (3) hydrologic function, (4) landform and topography, (5) lithology, (6) climate, (7) air quality and (8) natural pr
-
Ranking of Desirable Species; i.e. Oak and Ash
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The ranking of desirable species, i.e. oaks and ash, based on their percentage of the total number of stems initially sampled over all study plots in east central and south Mississippi.
-
Regeneration Potential
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The method proposed by Johnson (1980) is based on the silvical characteristics of the species. It is a numerical evaluation of regeneration potential which emphasizes the size (height class) and numbers of advance regeneration and the contribution of stu
-
Percent Morality and Survival of Desirable Species Seedlings, i.e. Oak and Ash
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Percent morality among permanent sample seedlings of desirable species, i.e. oaks and ash due to logging damage. Percent survival rates of seedlings of desirable species; i.e. oaks and ash, by height classes 1 and 2 years after harvest.
-
Percentage of Plots Adequately Stocked, with Oak and Ash
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The use of Johnson's (1980) evaluation technique (form 1) to predict percentage of plots adequately stocked, with oak and ash, per tract before and after harvesting.
-
Number of Seedlings required for regenration plots to be stocked
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The number of seedlings required for regeneration plots to be stocked, for different levels of deer pressure (from Marquis and others 1992).
-
Table 1.3--Amphibian species within the South with global rankings of G1a, G2b, and G3c
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Dominance Probabilities for Northern Red Oak
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Based on the relationship between preharvest size of advance reproduction and its development after harvest, we have developed a model that predicts the probability that an advance red oak stem will become dominant or codominant in the next stand as a fun
-
Comparison of Natural and Artificial Language Characteristics
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Comparison of Natural and Artificial Language Characteristics.
-
Language-Based knowledge representation methods
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Comparison of natural and artificial language systems in areas such as generality, amibiguity, and problem solving power.
-
Language Based Knowledge Representation Methods
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Comparison of natural and artificial language systems in areas such as generality, ambiguity, and problem solving power.
-
Existing ecosystem management decision support software for forest conditions of the United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This representative sample is arranged by operational scale and function.
-
Existing ecosystem management decision support software for forest conditions of the United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This representative sample is arranged by operational scale and function.
-
Existing ecosystem management decision support software for forest conditions of the United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This representative sample is arranged by operational scale and function.
-
Primary networks in the EMDS knowledge base for assessing watershed condition
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Each logic network evaluates a specific proposition about the state of watershed condition.
-
Propositions associated with EMDS networks antecedent to the watershed processes network.
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
A simplified hierarchy of the logic structure under the network for watershed processes illustrates the scope of the watershed processes topic.
-
Existing ecosystem management decision support software for forest conditions of the United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This representative sample is arranged by operational scale and function.
-
Table 1.4--Reptile species within the South with global rankings of G1a, G2b, and G3c
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Alternatives comparison
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Mean Annual, Maximum, and Minimum Temperatures
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Mean Annual, Mean Maximum, and Mean Minimum Temperature in Southern Appalachian Region (degrees Farenheit)
-
Geologic Time Scale
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
A simplified geologic time scale showing the precambrian, paleozoic, mesozoic, and cenozoic eras.
-
Watershed Number
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Watershed Number, corresponding HUC (Hydrological Unit Code), and area of watershed.
-
Temperature and Precipitation in the Southern Appalachians
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
t255
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Typical HTU product distribution
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Typical HTU product distribution
From: Conversion Of Biomass Residues To Transportation Fuels With The HTU Process.
Paper presentation at the 14th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition.
-
Use of Wood-Based Energy in the 15 Countries of the European Union in 1990
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table depicting the use of wood-based energy in the European Union in 1990
-
8.1- Growth rates of pines throughout the World
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
MAI = mean annual increment. Data from Arnold (1995), Evans (1992), Borders and Bailey (2001), Yin and others (1998)
-
Table 4.1: Intensively Managed planted pioen growth and yield data (wood volume) for medium sites and 25-year rotation
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
MIC 1 = site preparation and planting; MIC 2 = site preparation and planting of genetically improved seedlings; MIC 3 = moderate intensity with fertilizer application; MIC 4= high intensity in which herbicide use is added to MIC 3 treatments; MIC 5 = very
-
Table 1.5--Bird species within the South with global rankings of G1a, G2b, and G3c
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 4.2- Extent of intensive forest management practices in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
8.1- Growth rates of pines throughout the World
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
MAI = mean annual increment. Data from Arnold (1995), Evans (1992), Borders and Bailey (2001), Yin and others (1998)
-
14.1--Current status and trends in annual use of forest management practices by forest type based on FIA data
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
TSI= Timber Stand Management
-
14.2--Current status and trends in annual use of forest management practices by owner based on FIA data
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
14.3 Southwide Untamed Management Scenarios
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
SI=site index; MIC=management intensity class; CMAI=culmination of mean annual increments. a Planting density = 600 trees per ac; medium sites (SI=60)
-
14.5--Comparison of TAUYIELD projected growth and yield data for unthinned MICs with FIA data and modeling assumptions. Merchantable wood volume
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
(Ft3/ac to a 4 in. diameter outside bark top)
MIC=management intensity class; F=fertilization; H=herbicide application.
a TAUYIELD assumes SI 60 at base age 25 and planting density is 600 trees per ac; SRTS-FIA, 1993 RPA, and 1997 FIA Georgia survey da
-
Table 14.6--Summary of financial analysis of loblolly pine by MIC for medium sites (pulpwood $25 per cord, sawtimber $350 per thousand board feet) at 6 percent real discount rate
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
MIC=management intensity class; NPV=net present value; SEV=soil expectation value; IRR=internal rates of return; SRTS=Subregional Timber Supply Model; FIA=Forest Inventory and Analysis, USDA Forest Service. a Assumed 1 percent real annual timber appreci
-
Major Purposes of Fire Use in Prehistory by Cultural Period
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The major reasons American Indians used fire in each of 4 prehistoric cultural periods.
-
Pre-European Fire Frequencies in the South by Region
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Lists estimates of fire frequencies in 3 southern physiographic regions in time preceding European settlement.
-
Four Major Types of Human-Caused Fire Regimes in Appalachian Mixed-Oak Forests Since 4000 BP
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 1.6--Mammal species within the South with global rankings of G1a, G2b, and G3c
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Four Major Types of Human-Caused Fire Regimes in Mixed-Oak Forests Since 4000 BP
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Lists major types of fire in mixed-oak forests in the past 4000 years of human history.
-
Four Major Types of Human-Caused Fire Regimes in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Four types of human-caused fire regimes in the South
-
Federal Legislation Governing Cultural Resources that Also Affects Fire Management
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
State legislation governing cultural resources that Also Affects Fire Management
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Three Types of Cultural Resource Sites
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
A Selected History of WUI Fires in the United States
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Human Health Effects of Selected Smoke Constituents from Biomass Smoke
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This table lists a number of the ingredients of biomass smoke and some of the effects that have been documented by scientific research.
-
Heart and Lung Conditions Associated with Biomass Smoke
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This table lists some of the symptoms that are produced when people are exposed to biomass smoke as documented in the scientific literature.
-
Fire Severity Classification System
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Damage Estimates from Crown Scorch
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 1.7--Number of breeding bird species with increasing, decreasing, and stable trends from 1966 to 1996 by life-history characteristics for the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Burn Severity Classification
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Tree Characteristics Important to Surviving Fire and an Overall Species Resistance to Fire Rating
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Type and Location of Buds that Regenerate New Shoots after Fire by Broad Plant Groups
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Transient and Persistent Seed Sources
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Occurrence of transient seeds and persistent seeds consisting of soil and canopy stored and fire stimulated seed germination for broad plant species groups in the United States and Canada.
-
Fire Effects on Tree Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Southeastern tree species included in the Fire Effects Information System and the Encyclopedia of Southern Fire Science (ESFS). For information on a particular species, either access the link provided to FEIS or use the search tool provided in ESFS.
-
Fire Effects on Shrub Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Southeastern shrub species included in the Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) and the Encyclopedia of Southern Fire Science (ESFS). For information on a particular species, either access the link provided to FEIS or use the search tool provided in ESF
-
Fire Effects on Vine Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Southeastern vine species included in the Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) and the Encyclopedia of Southern Fire Science (ESFS). For information on a particular species, either access the link provided to FEIS or use the search tool provided in ESFS
-
Fire Effects on Forb Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Southeastern forb species included in the Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) and the Encyclopedia of Southern Fire Science (ESFS). For information on a particular species, either access the link provided to FEIS or use the search tool provided in ESFS
-
Fire Effects on Grass Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Southeastern grass species included in the Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) and the Encyclopedia of Southern Fire Science (ESFS). For information on a particular species, either access the link provided to FEIS or use the search tool provided in ESF
-
Fire Effects on Cacti, Ferns, Lichens, and Bryophyte Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Southeastern cacti, fern and fern ally, lichen, and bryophyte species included in the Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) and the Encyclopedia of Southern Fire Science (ESFS). For information on a particular species, either access the link provided to
-
Table 1.8—The national trends of raptors that occur in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Fire Effects on Invasive or Exotic Plant Species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Introduced species (both invasive and non-invasive) included in the Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) and the Encyclopedia of Southern Fire Science (ESFS). For information on a particular species, either access the link provided to FEIS or use the se
-
Streamside Management Zone (SMZ) width recommendations for 12 southern states
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
BMP manuals available at www.usabmp.net
-
Relationship between the saturated solubility of oxygen in water and water temperature
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Based on Brooks et al. 1997
-
Fire Effects on Erosion in the SE
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Rates of erosion and soil loss for 7 southeastern forest sites that received various prescribed burn treatments
-
Soil Invertebrates in the Southeast
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Selected soil and litter dwelling organisms in southeastern forests, with approximate ranges in size for length and width, and functional types represented
-
Plant Essential Macronutrients
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Effects of Prescribed Burning on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Pine Forests of the Southern Coastal Plain.
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Hazard Ratings for Soil Loss Following Prescribed Burns
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Potential Risk for Adverse Soil Effects in the Southern Region
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Low = good probability of meeting objectives under a variety of conditions
Moderate = fair probability of meeting objectives, prescription must be carefully planned and executed
High = poor probability of meeting objectives even under best conditions
-
Soil Rating Criteria for Potential Damage to Soil by Fire
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Pre-European Fire Frequencies in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 1.9--Ecosystem communities that have declined by 70% or more in the South since European settlement
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table A: Soil Risk Rating Criteria for Potential Damage to Soil by Fire
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This table applies to soils with a surface layer >20 cm thick or soils with a surface layer 10-20 cm thick on a slope <30%.
High or moderate risk ratings may indicate the need to consider winter burning, alternate lighting techniques, monitoring of fue
-
Table B: Soil risk rating criteria for potential damage to soil by fire
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Surface layer 10-20 cm thick and slope >30% or surface layer < 10 cm and slope < 30%. High or moderate ratings may indicate the need to consider winter burning, alternate lighting techniques, monitoring of fuel moisture content, yarding of unmerchantable
-
Table C: Soil rating criteria for potential damage to soil by fire
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This table applies to soils with a surface layer < 10 cm depth and on slopes > 30%. High or moderate ratings may indicate the need to consider winter burning, alternate lighting techniques, monitoring of fuel moisture content, yarding of unmerchantable ma
-
Guidelines for using prescribed fire to improving wildlife habitat
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
From USDA Forest Service 1989
-
Fire effects on physical and chemical water quality in the southeast
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Categories of liability law and their related statutes
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Total available grass accumulations under pine overstories
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Total litter weight under shortleaf pine stands as affected by stand basal area and age of rough
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Total litter weight under slash and longleaf pine stands as affected by stand basal area and age of rough
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Total litter weight under loblolly pine stands as affected by stand basal area and age of rough
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 1.10—The Nature Conservancy’s summary of distributions and threats for rare communities of the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Litter and duff weight accumulations in developing undisturbed loblolly pine plantations from 6 to 23 years
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Understory vegetative dry weight in the palmetto-gallberry type as related to age of rough and understory height
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Litter buildup in upland hardwood stands
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Estimated available litter fuel weights for different total litter weights and moisture contents
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Estimated total available fuel (litter + vegetation) as a function of total litter layer moisture content, total litter weight, and understory vegetative dry weight
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Available fuel 1 inch in diameter and less in the unpiled pine logging debris type
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Dry weight of foliage and branches to 1-1/2 inches in diameter for individual, shortleaf pine trees
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Fine fuel moisture content of dead grass (1-hour timelag)
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Moisture content of pine needle litter
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Average moisture of hardwood litter under an upland oak stand in Eastern Tennessee
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 1.11--Examples of soft and hard mast-producing species in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Total litter moisture content from duration of (last) rain and days since (last) rain data
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Energy Content of Gallberry and Saw Palmetto
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Flammability Characteristics of Southern Species I
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Summary of results from studies quantifying flammability of southern species.
-
Flammability characteristics of southern species II
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Summary of results from studies quantifying characteristics of flammability for southern species, but not as main research objectives.
-
Fuel type, wind speed, and fuel moisture effects on fireline intensity
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Predicted heat release and fireline intensity of tall grass, southern rough, and light logging slash under different wind speeds and fuel moisture contents. Predictions were generated in Behave Plus 2.0.2.
-
Fuel Model Parameters
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Fuel model parameters for tall grass, southern rough, and light logging slash used to represent typical fine, medium, and large fuels common in the Southeast
-
FBPS Fuels Model
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table: Saturation Vapor Pressure
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Dew Point, Vapor Pressure, and Absolute Humidity
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Humidity Example for a Pressure of 29 inches
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 1.12--Selected mammals of the South that utilize hard and soft mast in their diets
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
t330
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Postfire Treatment Effectiveness Ratings
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Preliminary Results from Paired Catchment Studies of Contour-Felled Log Erosion Barrier (LEB) Treatment Effectiveness
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Preliminary Results from Paired Catchment Studies of Contour-Felled Log Erosion Barrier (LEB) Treatment Effectiveness
-
Alabama Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Michele's table
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Arkansas Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Florida Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Georgia Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Kentucky Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Louisana Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 1.13--Selected birds of the South that utilize hard and soft mast in their diets
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Mississippi Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
North Carolina Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Oklahoma Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
South Carolina Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Tennessee Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Texas Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Virginia Wildfire Stats
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Canebrake biota
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
This table offers a summary of biota commonly associated with canebrakes in the Southeast from data presented by Platt et al. 2001.
-
Influence of Canebrakes on Water Quality
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Percent reduction of sediment and nutrients in the initial 3.3 meters of southern Illinois giant cane and mixed forest riparian buffer zones.
-
Table 1: Dominant variations of the oak savanna in the Midwest
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 1.14--National Park Service national parks and monuments in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 4: Stem density of saplings ( > 1.5 m height and < 5 cm dbh) by species
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Table 3: Mean tree basal area and stem density
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Account Setting in User Preferences
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Examples of Knowledge Management Tools
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
A classification of types of knowledge management tools illustrating the difference between scientific content management systems and other types of internet sites.
-
Data bases used in studies of different types of land base changes.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Five categories of significant changes affecting forest area are: 1) afforestation; 2) deforestation; 3) forest fragmentation; 4) forest parcelization; and 5) increased numbers of structures, such as houses, on forest land.
-
Example studies of determinants of land base changes involving forestland.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Table 1 lists examples of studies that have examined land base dynamics in the United States, where millions of acres of land shift uses each year (USDA NRCS 2001), reflecting billions of choices made by individuals, corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and governments.
-
Sources of land-use projections, by region.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
No large-scale forest parcelization projections were located.
-
Diagnostic results for a sample of tree mortality locations randomly selected from photo-interpretation of satellite imagery of Ft. Hood, TX.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
A sample of 119 polygons, or 10% of the total, was randomly selected for ground truthing. Oak wilt was found to be the cause of mortality in 82 (69%) of the centers. The major factor, other than oak wilt, delineated as dying or dead trees on the imagery was brush clearing operations (19.3%), where piles of dead trees resemble the crowns of dead, standing live oaks. With the exception of two cases, all of the brush piles consisted of Ashe juniper cut and stacked during land clearing operations. Relatively few other causes of mortality were found, including fire, wind damage and damage to trees caused by military operations. At eight of the sites visited, the trees identified as oaks were actually some other species, or, where the causes of mortality were not readily identified.
-
Species composition and average diameters of trees located in sample cluster plots for the 2003 - 2004 survey.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The highest stand densities were found at the nesting sites within GCW habitat (GCW/NS) with 1298 trees/ha. Stand densities were also relatively high in habitat where there was no oak wilt (GCW/non-OW = 883 trees/ha.). At oak wilt locations both within and outside of habitat, the stand densities were relatively lower. There were also notable trends in the species compositions among the various categories. Juniper composition was far lower outside of GCW habitat where oak wilt was present (13%) when compared to the plots located within habitat. Live oak density was greater in oak wilt locations, whether they were within (21%) or outside of habitat (33%) as compared to the uninfected plots within habitat (4%) or nesting sites (2%).
-
Juniper to oak ratios for each of the four sampling categories at Fort Hood.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The juniper to oak ratios (J:O) varied widely among the four sampling categories. The highest J:O ratio was 6.57:1 in the GCW habitat where there was no oak wilt. The lowest was 0.24:1 in oak wilt centers outside of GCW habitat.
-
Table 1.15--U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service refuges within the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Accuracy of the SPB Prediction System by state: 1987 to 2005
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Prediction accuracy by state: 1987 to 2005
-
Accuracy of the SPB Prediction System for 12 states from 1987 to 1998
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Prediction accuracy by state: 1987 to 1998
-
Accuracy of the SPB Prediction System by state: 1999 to 2005
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Prediction accuracy by state: 1999 to 2005
-
Prediction accuracy by state: 1987 to 1998
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Accuracy of the SPB Prediction System for 12 states from 1987 to 1998. Based on state averages. Counties, parishes, and National Forest Ranger Districts surveyed.
-
Prediction accuracy by state: 1999 to 2005
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Accuracy of the SPB Prediction System for 12 states from 1999 - 2005. Based on state averages. Counties, parishes, and National Forest Ranger Districts surveyed.
-
Example Calculation of the Cellular WFSI
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Example of the Calculation of the Cellular Value for the Probability of an Acre Burning.
-
Bavarian Independent Variables
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Independent variables used to produce a potential distribution for Phytophthora alni in Bavarian forested areas.
-
Global Independent Variables
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Independent variables used to produce a global potential distribution for Phytophthora alni.
-
Global criteria re-classifications to hazard rankings
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
To develop the Multi-Criteria susceptibility model for the globe, the unique numerical values from each criterion had to be standardized. Therefore, each dataset was re-classified using a hazard ranking of 0-10. The decision rules from both classification trees as well as additional expert knowledge were used as a guide in setting the hazard rankings.
-
Global Mask
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Data Sets Used to eliminate areas where Alnus species and Phytophthora alni could not survive.
-
Table 1.16--National forest location and acreage in the South
—
by
Cole Sherer
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
-
Global Criteria and Arithmetic Weights
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Since slope predicted most of the variability in the classification tree it was weighted at 50 %, aspect and the landform index were both weighted at 25 %.
-
Hazard: Global datasets used to assign hazard
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Global datasets used to assign hazard.
-
Global Masks and Arithmetic Weights
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
To produce the final global susceptibility surface, areas that were identified in the global distribution as having a potential for a P. alni infestation were classified according to hazard. Biome and stream data were combined in an equal weighted overlay to assign a hazard ranking. The hazard ranking was based on each pixel's occurrence within ecological biomes similar to the biomes where P. alni presently occurs, as well as its proximity to streams.
-
Phytophthora alni susceptibility area for the globe.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Pixels within the selected biomes were assigned hazard rankings based on their proximity to streams. A set of three global stream buffers at distances of 1km were used to assign the hazard rankings. Pixels which had the potential for infestation were given a high hazard ranking if they fell within 1 km of the stream. Those pixels between 1 and 2 km were assigned a medium potential hazard, and pixels between 2 and 3 km from the stream were assigned a low potential hazard. Pixels that were found greater than 3 km from a stream or outside the selected biomes were given a hazard ranking of little or no potential hazard. The final global susceptibility surface had 27, 835, 766 square kilometers of suitable area where alder and P. alni could survive. Of that area 1, 482, 487 square kilometers (5.33 %) were highly susceptible to P. alni; 3, 930, 660 square kilometers (14.12 %) had a medium susceptibility; 5, 721, 467 square kilometers (20.55 %) had a low susceptibility; and 16, 701, 152 square kilometers (60.00 %) had little or no susceptibility .
-
List of drought years experienced regionally in the San Bernardino Mountains.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The years of moderate or severe drought, the average % of total average annual precipitation (based on the 120 yr record), the % of total average annual precipitation in the year following drought, and whether a bark beetle epidemic occurred after the sequence of drought years.
-
Percent-cover ranges of SSU strata and strata acreages
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
SSU strata acreages within the entire piñon/juniper region and the region of aerial imagery coverage are shown, including proportions by stratum of total study area and aerial imagery coverage for the two regions.
-
Mean proportions of land area comprised of various cover types for each stratum
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
For each stratum, the mean proportions (±SE) of area (as viewed from aerial imagery) comprised of dead, live, and total tree cover, and ground. Weighted mean proportions (±SE) for the entire pinon/juniper study area (i.e., across strata) are also provided.
-
Mean proportions of total tree cover that have died
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
For each percent-cover stratum, the mean proportion (±SE) of total tree cover that has died, and mean weighted proportion (±SE) across all strata.
-
Costs of conducting a multistage sample
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
Approximate material costs and labor for an experienced analyst to conduct a multistage sample to estimate piñon mortality in the Williams Ranger District.
-
Monte Carlo simulation estimates from Procedure C.
—
by
mhowell
—
last modified
2008-11-14 11:12 AM
-
The estimates obtained using Procedure C revealed in dramatic fashion that the source of uncertainty making the greatest contribution to uncertainties in the estimates of both Ftotal and Atotal was spatial correlation in the realizations of the forest/non-forest maps.
-
Table 1.17--Summary of inventoried roadless areas in the Sou